The Uttarakhand high court refused to quash criminal proceedings against a man accused of bigamy. A woman does not need to prove Saptapadi at the initial stage of a case. The court stated that proving essential marriage rituals occurs during the trial. The husband had challenged the summoning order, citing lack of Saptapadi proof. The high court agreed with the Supreme Court’s approach on this matter.
Read more at the source
Disclaimer: The content of this post is sourced from external sites and is for informational purposes only. All rights and credits belong to the original authors and publishers.