Mrs Chudamasa’s counsel argued that the AO had erred in treating Rs 2,31,20,000 as investment made during financial year 2017-18. He submitted that the actual payments during the year aggregated to Rs 1.85 crore, comprising Rs 1.73 crore paid to the builder and Rs 11.86 lakh towards registration charges and legal expenses. Read on to know on what grounds did she win in ITAT Mumbai.
Read more at the source
Disclaimer: The content of this post is sourced from external sites and is for informational purposes only. All rights and credits belong to the original authors and publishers.